Tag Archives: Israel

Israel: Deny, Deny, Deny

8 Aug

If Israel really is the “victim” of Arab aggression as it has claimed to be since its inception over 60 years ago, why is it attempting to erase controversial stains from its history? Israel is now cutting its 1948 “catastrophe” from its history textbooks:

The Israeli government will remove references to what Palestinians call the “catastrophe” of Israel’s creation from textbooks for Arab schoolchildren, the education minister said Wednesday.

The reference to “al-naqba,” the Arabic word catastrophe, as Palestinians call their defeat and exile in the war over Israel’s 1948 creation, was inserted by a dovish Israeli education minister in 2007.

The phrase remains contentious six decades later, a symptom of the continuing divisions in Israel. Many Israeli Arabs identify politically with their Palestinian counterparts in the West Bank and Gaza. As a result, some Israeli Jews accuse Israeli Arabs of disloyalty to the country.

Israel’s current government, headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and his hard-line Likud Party, includes members who favor cracking down on Israeli Arabs by ordering loyalty oaths or even moving them out of Israel.

“No other country in the world, in its official curriculum, would treat the fact of its founding as a catastrophe,” Education Minister Gideon Saar of Likud told Israel’s parliament on Wednesday.

Israeli Arab lawmaker Hana Sweid accused the government of “naqba denial.”

“It’s a major attack on the identity of the Palestinian Arab citizens of the state of Israel, on their memories and their adherence to their identity,” he told the Associated Press.

Since this “Al-naqba,” the Palestinians have been the victims of intense and barbaric sanctions, starvation, and slaughter at the hands of the Israelis, and they wonder why some Palestinians and Arabs might be opposed to ignoring the source of where it all started?

This is just another example of how foolish it is for the US to be involved in this bloody and bitter issue. Why is it in our interest to take sides in an ethnic, religious, and historically complex war in the middle of the desert?

The Palestinian Police States

8 Aug

It is common knowledge that there are many obstacles to Palestinian statehood and the legitimate recognition of Palestinian civil liberties. Israeli policies represent the biggest roadblocks to peace, and for 40 years, Israel has starved, sanctioned, apartheid-ed, and waged indiscriminate warfare on the Palestinian people. Here in the US, Congress, influenced by the hawkish AIPAC, supports and cheers on nearly every act of terror Israel commits against its neighbors, while publicly denouncing Palestinian terrorism against Israeli civilians. The media also has a very pro-Israel bias, and both the mainstream Left and Right shroud this incredibly complex and delicate issue with black-and-white, good-vs-evil rhetoric.

What is less discussed, but just as harmful to the peace process, is the dictatorial and oppressive governments that control the divided Palestinian territories. There are two police-states in Palestine; Hamas keeps its iron fist over the Gaza strip, and the Western-backed Palestinian Authority (PA) bullies its subjects in the West Bank. These two groups bitterly oppose each other, and in their simultaneous struggle for power and control, Palestinians are caught in the middle.

As the power struggle continues, Palestinians are subjected to random bomb blasts, assassinations by masked gunmen, excruciating torture while detained, no access to lawyers, politically motivated arrests, and the banning of peaceful demonstrations. The Preventive Security Services (PSS) of the PA has been accused of torturing to death Hamas detainees, and human rights groups have expressed concern about frequent Hamas police raids and Palestinian citizens tried in military courts on death row for “collaboration with the enemy,” backed by dubious testimony or hearsay.

The US plays an important role in these Palestinian police states. The Pentagon has a history of funding both sides of military conflicts around the globe, especially off the eastern shores of the Mediterranean. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is throwing a billion dollars at the Palestinian Authority rather than sending medicine and food to the Gaza Strip that’s in ashes from last Christmas’ blitzkrieg. Their enemies, the Israelis, get $3 billion a year to subsidize settlements, crush Palestinian resistance, slaughter its neighbors, and run its socialist-military-economy. Why are we funding both sides of a bloody, bitter, and complicated conflict?

The twin-police states governing the Palestinian territories are a direct result of brutal Israeli policies, and the cycle conflict continues. Anytime Israel decides it needs a little elbow room (especially when its election season) and decides to drop a million (internationally banned) cluster bombs on dense concentrations of defenseless Arabs, it strengthens the legitimacy of the PA, Hamas, and Hezbollah in Lebanon. These groups exist as a violent response to Israel running the largest open air prisons in the world in its Occupied Territories, denying any resemblances of rights to Palestinians, bulldozing their homes, and frustrating every peace deal that would actually work. Constantly finding reasons to seek war and create enemies is Israel’s forte; besides, what else would it do with its massive military might (courtesy of you and I, the taxpayer)?

The Obama Administration’s slightly less friendly stance towards Israel is a positive and welcoming sign, but what this delicate region needs most of all is for the US to mind it’s own business. Ending military aid and remaining neutral would give both sides the incentive to sit down and actually negotiate with each other. But the Pentagon has this paranoid fear that if there is something happening in the world, the US must send arms, influence governments, and arrogantly stick its nose where it doesn’t belong.

I sympathize with the Palestinians, who most of the time act defensively against Israel’s criminal occupations. The last thing they need, however, is for the US to throw matches on the fire with its unnecessary meddling.

Persia in the crosshairs: will the U.S. attack Iran?

27 Jun

Ever since the end of World War II and the defeat of Nazi Germany at the hands of the Allies, the U.S. government and its media allies have been consistently warning about “new Hitlers” that must be defeated and must not be “appeased.” In the 1990s it was Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, then it was Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and now the U.S. and Israel are warning about the supposed threat from Iran.

Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres has recently stated that Iran, and its president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is an imminent threat to Israel as well as to the U.S. The world has “no choice” but to compare the threat posed by Iran now to that of Nazi Germany before the Second World War, President Shimon Peres told President Obama in Washington on Tuesday:

“Iran is a threat not just to Israel, but to the whole world. As Jews, after being subjected to the Holocaust, we cannot close our eyes in light of the grave danger emerging from Iran,” Peres said.

“If Europe had dealt seriously with Hitler at that time, the terrible Holocaust and the loss of millions of people could have been avoided. We can’t help but make the comparison.”

The neoconservatives in the previous Bush Regime, and the nauseating right-wing talk show hosts and “pundits” have all been demanding Iranian blood be spilled for years now. Not to be outdone, the hawks in the Obama Regime have been eyeing the Persian “Nazis,” and of course, the U.S. must “do something” about this “little Hitler.”

Ever since Bush’s 2002 speech, where he labeled Iran (as well as Iraq and North Korea) part of the “Axis Of Evil,” Iran has been in the Imperial City’s crosshairs. President Obama, who campaigned with a less hawkish approach to Iran, has quickly switched positions, and with the help of his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is quietly beating the war drums. But is Iran a threat, let alone a threat comparable to the monsters of the Nazi regime?

Iran is not a threat to U.S. national security in the least bit, since it is a third world country, and compared to the U.S. arsenal, has a small army, a small navy, and barely an air force. It has nowhere near the technology to make a nuclear weapon (only nuclear power), has complied with every IAEA weapons inspection, and for years has wanted to engage the U.S. diplomatically. And oh ya…it’s 7,000 miles away from the east coast of America’s shores. Iran is only a threat to U.S. hegemonic dominance in the Middle East, and is acting completely rationally and defensively.

Let’s turn the tables and look at ourselves through our “enemy’s” eyes, something the U.S. consistently fails to do. The U.S. has nearly 200,000 troops surrounding Iran in her neighbors Iraq and Afghanistan, has supported coups to overthrow their democratically elected leaders, gave Iran’s arch nemesis Saddam Hussein chemical weapons to use against Iran in the 1980s, and is threatening Iran with sanctions and even bombing. Who exactly is the threat to whom?

Iran, its thug of a leader, and the religious nuts who hold most of the power may be backwards and crazy, but they are no threat to the U.S., a country with thousands of nuclear weapons and the gigantic Atlantic Ocean separating us. What this “Hitlerizing” of Iran really shows is that the U.S. government needs an enemy, any enemy, to justify spending more money on its military than every other country in the world combined. Tragically, our complacent and Statist media does nothing to combat this insanity, and in fact salivates and kneels before our Roman Imperial Legion military-industrial-complex.

On “Morning Joe” this morning,  “conservative” Joe Scarborough interviewed General Petreaus, and the General was discussing how he was reading a biography of General Ulysses S. Grant, mass-murder extraordinaire. Scarborough, who obviously has a man-crush on Petreaus, then listened like a little dreamy-eyed schoolboy about how the “surge is working” and how the U.S. must stay the course in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The liberals are no better either. Remember the General Betray-Us ad? Well now that Obama is in power and is expanding Bush’s Afghanistan occupation (as well adding another front in Western Pakistan), the Left is now cheering on Petreaus’ desert killing fields.

The U.S. is bogged down in three wars in the Middle East, and is looking at adding a fourth to its plate, since the “Hitler” in Iran must be stopped! Plus, since the economy is in shambles, Obama is bragging that his new military spending will create 20,000 new (government) jobs.

We are digging hole after hole in the sands of Mesopotamia, and eventually we’re going to run out of shovels.